|
|
||
|
To respond to the L.A. Times learned ha ha editorial department for it’s second pontificator editorial of the New Year Season. The Word supercilious came to mind. In this age of namby pamby preachers and political correctness practically no one(L.A. Times excepted) is thrusting their political and religious fanaticisms in others faces. Having a working knowledge of Latin Hebrew and several ancient Greek dialects and a soldierly residence in Germany I can usually trust the words that come to mind. The Times article decrying the doubt some of us feel toward darwinian evolution under the thinly veiled cover of two or three straw men fits the dictionary.com definition of supercilious (a common Times attitude toward readers disagreeing with them): supercilious adjective
Recently the same board allows it’s reporters to write It’s the land, stupid, when the blinded by pc reporter couldn’t know the truth that some of his readers hold to as another opinion, “It’s religion“, even more correct, “It’s the Devil!”, You merely need to report, as has not been done of 1,000 murders and 800 church burnings, and 1,000,000 Kenyans displaced to suspect as much and then wacth and wait very patiently for the evidence to peek out from the veil of suppression the truth hides under, supercilious is as supercilious editorial board also is.Consider the following link, then get a copy of The Case for a Creator, by Lee Stroebel. Pay special attention to Guillermo Gonzalez chapter as you become for the firs time truly educated in the Platonic sense of reasoned dialogue. Then you might exchange supercilious propping up of a misunderstood Gallileo straw man for a reasoned consideration of the Gallilee Strong Man.
|
|
