Sunday March 29 L.A Times 2^nd page full page article, “why not try legalizing pot,” by Steve Lopez.

No, I didn’t waste my time reading it.

Now I know why the L.A. Times articles are so poorly written with strange pronouncements of hitherto unknown supporting data for their ultraliberal positions with outright belittling of their readership of their “stupid" readership. Are they are stoned out of their gourd over there? Really, it would explain a lot.

How about the article claiming faith in the creator is like being a stinking skunk at their birthday celebration over complete universal acceptance of disproven Darwinian concepts. Or the putdown of dissenting views on Rhodesia by saying, Hey, "It’s the economy, Stupid". We may be stupid, but we are not stoned on pot.

How about the L.A. “Stoner Times” claiming important research to improve humanity’s condition was promoted by disproven evolutionary concepts?

In real life, while the stoned educrat hours were whiled away,  Michael Behe and others were making the most remarkable microbiological discoveries and attendant theories and imaging so remarkable that had not Darwinian inquisitors Caiaphas and Annas attacked them with the crucificatorial Darwinian stoner mob, there is no telling what true research to improve humanity may have arisen.

Here are some answers to Steve Lopez’s sophomoric question:

Cancer, COPD, Emphysema.

Short term memory loss.

Personality disintegration

Loss of ambition

Endocrinological harm

Arrested secondary sex characteristics development

Hours and hours of lost productivity, study and social interaction

Et cetera, including Inability and disinclination to read while stoned, as in no L.A. Times reading.  Equals L.A. Times never emerging from bankruptcy!