What are social conservatives?   They are Pro Life conservatives.

So, all the candidates are pro life.  What is the difference, then?

There is the second pledge.  The perfect pro life position paper.

It leaves out Romney and Huntsman.

There is the record.  It cancels Romney.  He was pro choice before he flopped pro life,  worse, he bucked his religious faith to be pro choice, a hard grained pro choicer, like Pelosi bucked her religious faith..

Then, there is Obamacare, the ACA.  For the first time in federal lawmaking abortion practice is codified into federal law.  Obama is the father of it.  A stark issue that Obama’s core base doesn’t understand.  And, Obamacare is Romneycare.  So Romney can’t run against obama on a mighty core issue, and on which issue, much of Obama’s core base sides with social consercatives.  Yes the democrat registered voters are often pro life and so are many Christian black voters.

Romney and Newt are both frozen out on this defining issue.

In his defense, Romney did go to Louisiana to stump for the personhood amendment.  No other pro life candidate can say that.

All is not lost, my buckoes.  There is Ron Paul.  Ron Paul signed the second pledge.  Ron Paul has been a pro life M.D.(expertise on the subject as the best educated repo candidate) all along.  His libertarian stance demands he advocate abolition of Obamacare, with its legislated abortion regulations, codes, rules and requirements.  Furthermore, Ron Paul is now polling just as electable as Romney and even more electable than the others.  That electability lie fed the prochoice movement is satiated.(Lie because candidacies lead and influence and bring issues to the fore even if they lose, and predicted losers often gain steam and win dragging the movement forward with it.)

But the Paul foreign policy, Conservatives In Fiscal and Foreign Policy Only(CIFFPOs) may say. 

America’s international involvements have been a total disaster.  Pulling in our horns will do us good.  If Iran gets a nuke, Israel has 200 Nukes to counter that threat.  Our involvement in Iraq destroyed a 2 million strong Christian community and made Iraq far worse than it was.  America’s failed foreign policy is responsible for twin disaster:  million Iraqi Christian refugees we were unwilling to import and a million dead Iraqi Christians is doubly an antilife foreign policy.  We should therefore listen to what Ron Paul says because we are obviously too stupid a nation to get involved in foreign entanglements without doing grave harm.  Is it repetitive to say, no Irani/Israeli nuclear confrontation will match the two million lives harm done by our Iraqi entanglement.  A similar misery at our hands may well befall the Armenian Christian church in Iran if we stupidly entangle ourselves. There.  How many dead Christians can we bear the blame for, before God wipes us out as a nation.  Ron Paul foreign policy deserves to be looked at in the light of American stupidity rampant on Obama and GW Bush foreign policy watches.  No candidate but paul even recognizes the sorrows we’ve caused and the potential for worse by our idiotic foreign entanglements.

Finally, Ron Paul has shown at last that he is not afraid to attack the evil and the failed and the stupid policies of other republican leaders.  How much more will the brilliant young men who support him bring all of Obama’s corruption, machinations, pro abortion excesses,  et cetera, into the stark light.

Lastly and most importantly,  Paul is now shown by polling data to be equally electable against Obama as Romney and more electable than all the rest.  Additionally, by the social makeup of his supporters and by his prolife and antiwar (not antidefense) ideology, he alone is capable of raiding Obama's base. 

Why run a corporate raider who is a minority against an incumbent with a billion dollars to spend attacking those weaknesses.  I am not antifreedom in the economy, but we risk running Carl Icahn and infamous corporate raider, Victor Posner, except that they changed into Mormons.   I respect the place Jesus has in the mormon church name, but a lot of Christians see the canon of scripture as closed in 96 ad and are going to grit their teeth to swallow mormon kool aid and Climate change requiring government involvement kool aid with pro abortion flopjacks, to vote for a renowned corporate raider.